nixVersions.stable: nix_2_28 -> nix_2_31#440681
Merged
Mic92 merged 4 commits intoNixOS:staging-nextfrom Sep 22, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Marking draft; will hack on this tomorrow to resolve the eval errors. |
nixpkgs-ci
bot
added
10.rebuild-linux: 101-500
Contributor
Author
|
Contributor
Author
|
Contributor
Author
|
I'd appreciate any testing on macOS. |
nix-owners
bot
requested review from
Artturin,
Ericson2314,
RaitoBezarius,
edolstra,
lovesegfault,
roberth,
tomberek and
xokdvium
MattSturgeon
approved these changes
Sep 7, 2025
Contributor
MattSturgeon
left a comment
MattSturgeon
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not tested on my end, but no objections either 👍
Approved pending additional reviews with testing and/or more expertise.
nixpkgs-ci
bot
added
the
12.approvals: 1
Contributor
|
Member
|
ignore me found it |
Member
FWIW this is just #437208, so it can also go to |
Contributor
|
There might be some things to iron out in patch releases. @Mic92, what are the plans for Darwin build-dir length changes? That should be ported over to 2.31 if it's going to become the new stable. There are also other relevant changes that we should pick from @emilazy's stack for Lix to mitigate the socket path length limitations. |
Contributor
Author
I should have linked it. nixpkgs/pkgs/tools/package-management/nix/README.md Lines 31 to 35 in a4716b0 Evidently it has to do with rebuilds of the NixOS test driver. EDIT: @emilazy sniped me |
Contributor
Author
|
Contributor
Author
|
I upgraded my macOS system to Nix 2.31.1 to produce the above build results. Nothing looks out of place.
I don't believe this has to do with Nix 2.31 ... |
Contributor
Author
|
@Mic92 I think this is good to merge unless you've got extra testing you'd like to do. |
nixpkgs-ci
bot
added
the
12.approved-by: package-maintainer
Member
|
Contributor
Author
|
On |
Member
|
Member
This is the failure I am getting from |
Co-authored-by: Guillame Maudoux <layus.on@gmail.com>
Mic92
force-pushed
the
nixVersions.stable-upgrade-to-2.31.1
branch
from
34135e6 to
9e95ace
Compare
Member
|
removed nixStatic from the tests, I might also drop nixStatic from nixpkgs because the pkgsStatic maintainance is not good enough and it always seems I have to fix all kinds of dependencies for a new nix release each time. |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Member
|
Binutils deprecated the gold linker, so do we. We already did this a while ago in the nix repository since we switched to mold for development.
Mic92
force-pushed
the
nixVersions.stable-upgrade-to-2.31.1
branch
from
74983bc to
c27c325
Compare
misuzu
approved these changes
Sep 22, 2025
Contributor
misuzu
left a comment
misuzu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The cross build to riscv64 is fixed, thanks!
% nix-build . -A pkgsCross.riscv64.nixVersions.stable
/nix/store/qazd6knqxv2a0d5gz76m56y5gs3yzcq4-nix-riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-2.31.2
53 tasks
Contributor
Author
|
Hell yeah. This is going to be a staging-next for the ages! And if the 2.32 release (with the awesome memory wins) happens soon enough, we might be able to sneak that into 25.11 as the stable Nix. |
Member
@xokdvium is working on a 2.31 backport actually. |
Contributor
|
After this update, the nix build without AWS support produces an error: Config: |
Contributor
|
The overriding interface has changed, since componentized builds: nixVersions.nix_2_31.overrideScope (final: prev: { nix-store = prev.nix-store.override { withAWS = false; }; }) |
Contributor
|
@xokdvium not working this variant: Or am I doing something wrong. |
Contributor
|
Presumably something like this should work. There's 2 layers of overrides here, one is the overlay and the other is the overrideScope. nixpkgs.overlays = [
(_: prevPkgs: { nix = prevPkgs.nixVersions.stable.overrideScope (final: prev: { nix-store = prev.nix-store.override { withAWS = false; }; } }))
]; |
Contributor
|
Error: |
Contributor
|
Sorry, I was typing on the phone. Just fix the parenthesis, but the gist is that. You can just look up how to specify overlays in the relevant nixpkgs documentation. |
Contributor
|
The first error occurs again: function 'anonymous lambda' called with unexpected argument 'withAWS'. Config: nixpkgs.overlays = [
(_: prevPkgs: {
nix = prevPkgs.nixVersions.stable.overrideScope (final: prev: { nix-store = prev.nix-store.override { withAWS = false; }; });
})
]; |
13 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
12 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
NixCon 2025 has been a wonderful experience. Let's make it even better for the whole world by giving them a new, fresh, well-tested Nix version.
Per the readme, we're targeting staging.
Previous bump:
Things done
passthru.tests.nixpkgs-reviewon this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage../result/bin/.Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.